Archive for the 'Course News' Category

Topics and Teams

by Dr. H - October 1st, 2014

We are winding up our first unit (Very Recent History, A Crash Course) which has included an introduction to some of the methodological issues involved in dealing with recent history including archives, sources, privacy, ethics, and chronology; a well-crafted journalist’s account of America Unwinding; and some exploration with an “archives” of our own making. We now have 6 teams (they are updated under the Teams tab, above) to help organize our next unit on Research Strategy, which starts after Thursday’s class.

By way of follow-up to our discussion today of fair use and copyright, I spotted this link today – a flowchart about plagiarism – worth a look.

For the Journal #4 due on Thurs 10/2, please write a 600-700 word journal post that lays out your topic as it currently stands AND your anticipated primary source base. The latter is not hypothetical or what you HOPE to find, but should be actual sources you’ve already looked at and know that they exist and are open to you. Bring laptops to class ready for a writing exercise.

Documents from Now for 9/30

by Dr. H - September 29th, 2014

For Tues 9/30, we will discuss both the essays from Doing Recent History on archives, and also speculate on what could/should be added to our “Documents from Now” list – so bring your ideas.

What did I miss in the list? What would future historians love to have access to? As we “build” our own archive, how might the contemporary archival challenge raised in these essays apply to our own work?

The Unwinding and Journal 3 Prompt

by Dr. H - September 18th, 2014

For our discussion of George Packer’s The Unwinding on Tuesday Sept 23, please prepare by reading all the “year” pages, and the chapters covering your assigned main character (Dean Price, Jeff Connaughton, or Tammy Thomas), and then your assigned other profile (celebrity or place). Think about how the thesis posed so elegantly in the prologue plays out in these assigned sections. Pay attention not only to content but to form – i.e. not just what the story is, but how Packer tells it by what he says – and does not say. Be ready to provide a short capsule summary of your assigned sections, and to explain what we learn about the recent past from studying these places or people. Continue reading →

Journal 2 Prompt: The Recent Past

by Dr. H - September 16th, 2014

Thursday’s class will introduce a new book, George Packer’s The Unwinding, a literary nonfiction book about America’s recent past. He’s making an overall argument (that the American promise has begun to unwind, and that we can date the start of that process to about the late 1970s), but it’s certainly not a scholarly book. Rather, The Unwinding is written by a talented journalist (he’s a New Yorker staff writer) for a popular audience through interwoven biographies of both famous and ordinary Americans. I think Packer captures well the zeitgeist of the era and it makes for compelling reading and is a lovely model of innovative “recent history” writing; don’t just take my word for it, the book won the National Book Award for nonfiction in 2013 (PS: you can also find him visiting The Daily Show and the Colbert Report to pitch the book’s release).

For Thursday 9/18, please read the Prologue, and bring the book with you to class. Continue reading →

The Recent Past

by Dr. H - September 11th, 2014

P-R.DRHReading for Tuesday, Sept 16th: please read, and prepare to discuss, Potter/Romano, Doing Recent History, p. 1-44. Continue reading →

Course Intro: Writing Recent History

by Dr. H - September 4th, 2014

Reading Link: Arthur Schlesinger, Jr, “On Writing Contemporary HistoryThe Atlantic, March 1967.

Discussion Questions
Who is this author? What’s the historical context of his essay?
How does Schlesinger answer his own question, “When do contemporary affairs become history”?
How does he explain the rise of “contemporary history” as a legitimate and respectable endeavor?
In Schlesinger’s time, how were historical sources and evidence changing?
What does Schlesinger think is the historian’s obligation to living people?
John Dewey (1859-1952) is quoted here as claiming that ALL history is “history of the present.” What did he mean?
If you could go back in time to 1967 and enlighten Schlesinger about what would, or would not, change for historians and history by 2014, what would you tell him?

For our next class meeting (Tues 9/9)- 3 Things
Read the Schlesinger essay, considering the discussion questions above (i.e. be prepared to talk about them in class)

Bring a textbook that goes past 1980 (any textbook, does not have to be college-level, and does not have to be U.S.)

*and*

Go onto the course Blackboard and take the Research Self-Assessment Survey (it should be posted by the weekend)
(optional: while you’re on the course Blackboard, enroll in one of the Teams)

Welcome, Fall 2014 Students

by Dr. H - March 4th, 2014

Welcome to the History department capstone for Fall 2014. Continue reading →

Wrap-Up for Fall 2013

by Dr. H - December 9th, 2013

Mon 12/9/2013 = Last day of class. WSU is delayed until 10, but that won’t affect our class. Today is the course wrap-up. Continue reading →

Unit 4: Focus on Writing

by Dr. H - November 8th, 2013

This unit is all about scholarly argument, storytelling, and polishing your writing – which is appropriate given you are now in revision mode. Remember you have 25 days from handing in your final draft to handing in a revised draft. As we turn to some of the scholarship and sources around McCarthyism – a key part of the 1950s, and one that (as it turns out) no one is directly addressing in their research – pay particular attention to technique, method and writing style. Continue reading →

Unit 3: Narrative Techniques for Historians

by Dr. H - October 26th, 2013

During this (short) unit, please read and study the remainder of Storey’s book, especially as you put the final version of your paper together for its due date on Wed, Nov 6. Notice (and trust) what Storey has to say about narration, structure, and argument and the clear flow of logical thought, as well as follow his suggestions for the mechanics of citation and to observe the conventions of historical writing. Continue reading →